IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v59y2016i5p927-947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Getting caught up in the game: managing non-formal dynamics in the remediation of contaminated sediments in Oslo harbor

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Duijn
  • Arwin van Buuren
  • Magnus Sparrevik
  • Adriaan Slob
  • Gerald Jan Ellen
  • Amy Oen

Abstract

This study aims at describing, analyzing and evaluating the relation between management styles and process dynamics of a complex planning process confronted with unexpected dynamics. The development of an aquatic disposal site for dredged contaminated sediments in Oslo was managed by a project management style focused on timely and cost-effective implementation. Coupling the remediation project with another infrastructural project and the actual construction of the site led to unexpected dynamics in terms of resistance and controversy. Project management had difficulties in adjusting its style accordingly, resulting in even more delay and resistance. Managing complex planning projects requires a style suitable to the characteristics of the project and the capability of adjusting it to changing circumstances. The paper concludes with some explanations why it is difficult to change management styles in complex planning and implementation processes and complexity-embracing approaches to deal with this.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Duijn & Arwin van Buuren & Magnus Sparrevik & Adriaan Slob & Gerald Jan Ellen & Amy Oen, 2016. "Getting caught up in the game: managing non-formal dynamics in the remediation of contaminated sediments in Oslo harbor," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(5), pages 927-947, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:5:p:927-947
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2015.1047490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2015.1047490
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2015.1047490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marjorie Tendero & Béatrice Plottu, 2019. "How to implement a participatory decision support for contaminated brownfield? A case study from France," Post-Print hal-02500411, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:5:p:927-947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.