IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v58y2015i4p631-653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived landscape values and public participation in a road-planning process - a case study in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Marianne Henningsson
  • Malgorzata Blicharska
  • Hans Antonson
  • Grzegorz Mikusiński
  • G�rgen G�ransson
  • Per Angelstam
  • Lennart Folkeson
  • Sofia J�nsson

Abstract

The European Landscape Convention indicates that assessment of different dimensions that exist in landscapes should be taken into account in planning. In this study, we first investigated ecological, cultural and social values as perceived by the local people in a highway-planning process in Sweden. Next, we explored which factors influenced the local people's participation in the road-planning process. We used questionnaires, planning documents and the Theory of Planned Behavior to investigate the relations between different factors and local people's participation in the planning process. The results showed that people presumed the ecological values in the landscape to be adversely affected by the new road, while the social values would remain the same. Landowners had heard of the participatory-process, but few participated. Those who lived within 300 m of the road were more active in the planning process than people living further away. The findings suggest that people living within a few hundred metres of the road should be treated as key stakeholders in the planning process. The involvement of other stakeholders, and when in the public participation process stakeholders should be involved, is also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Marianne Henningsson & Malgorzata Blicharska & Hans Antonson & Grzegorz Mikusiński & G�rgen G�ransson & Per Angelstam & Lennart Folkeson & Sofia J�nsson, 2015. "Perceived landscape values and public participation in a road-planning process - a case study in Sweden," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 631-653, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:58:y:2015:i:4:p:631-653
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2013.876391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2013.876391
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2013.876391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:58:y:2015:i:4:p:631-653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.