IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v57y2014i9p1398-1421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the relationship between objective and subjective indicators of residential exposure to road traffic noise in the context of environmental justice

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Riedel
  • Joachim Scheiner
  • Grit M�ller
  • Heike K�ckler

Abstract

Noise action planning according to the EU Environmental Noise Directive aims to improve people's health. Although health inequalities exist, the Directive does not address social inequalities in residential exposure to road traffic noise. In multivariate regression analyses based on two urban study populations, we assess the relationship between objective and subjective indicators of residential exposure to road traffic noise as an issue of environmental justice. Residential neighbourhood satisfaction, socio-demographic and -economic, health-related and noise-related attitudinal factors were included as covariates additionally explaining the subjective response to road traffic noise (noise annoyance). Our results underline the need to select, operationalise and examine noise-related indicators very carefully, as objective noise exposure predicts noise annoyance insufficiently. Otherwise, urban environmental planning might miss environmentally unjust situations and fail to initiate distributive and procedural environmental justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Riedel & Joachim Scheiner & Grit M�ller & Heike K�ckler, 2014. "Assessing the relationship between objective and subjective indicators of residential exposure to road traffic noise in the context of environmental justice," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 1398-1421, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:9:p:1398-1421
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2013.808610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2013.808610
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2013.808610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefanie Dreger & Steffen Andreas Schüle & Lisa Karla Hilz & Gabriele Bolte, 2019. "Social Inequalities in Environmental Noise Exposure: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Natalie Riedel & Heike Köckler & Joachim Scheiner & Irene Van Kamp & Raimund Erbel & Adrian Loerbroks & Thomas Claßen & Gabriele Bolte, 2018. "Home as a Place of Noise Control for the Elderly? A Cross-Sectional Study on Potential Mediating Effects and Associations between Road Traffic Noise Exposure, Access to a Quiet Side, Dwelling-Related ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Rehana Shrestha & Klaus Telkmann & Benjamin Schüz & Pramesh Koju & Reshma Shrestha & Biraj Karmacharya & Gabriele Bolte, 2022. "Measuring Environmental Justice in Real Time: A Pilot Study Using Digital Participatory Method in the Global South, Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Peter Preisendörfer & Heidi Bruderer Enzler & Andreas Diekmann & Jörg Hartmann & Karin Kurz & Ulf Liebe, 2022. "Pathways to Environmental Inequality: How Urban Traffic Noise Annoyance Varies across Socioeconomic Subgroups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Matthias Braubach & Myriam Tobollik & Pierpaolo Mudu & Rosemary Hiscock & Dimitris Chapizanis & Denis A. Sarigiannis & Menno Keuken & Laura Perez & Marco Martuzzi, 2015. "Development of a Quantitative Methodology to Assess the Impacts of Urban Transport Interventions and Related Noise on Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:9:p:1398-1421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.