IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v57y2014i7p1101-1121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining life cycle analysis, human health and financial risk assessment for the evaluation of contaminated site remediation

Author

Listed:
  • Val�rie Cappuyns
  • Bram Kessen

Abstract

In the present study, the REC (Risk reduction, Environmental Merit and Costs), ReCiPe and PRINCE-super-TM methods for the estimation of the environmental, health and financial impacts of a soil remediation process have been evaluated. The evaluation was based on a case study in which a choice had to been made between soil excavation and steam extraction for the remediation of a former oil and fat processing plant. The example shows that it is complicated to come to one overall best remediation option, especially when different stakeholder preferences have to be taken into account. Results of the case study suggest that, besides environmental and human health and cost, the financial risk associated with the remediation project is also an important aspect to include in the evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Val�rie Cappuyns & Bram Kessen, 2014. "Combining life cycle analysis, human health and financial risk assessment for the evaluation of contaminated site remediation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 1101-1121, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:7:p:1101-1121
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2013.783460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2013.783460
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2013.783460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marjorie Tendero & Béatrice Plottu, 2019. "How to implement a participatory decision support for contaminated brownfield? A case study from France," Post-Print hal-02500411, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:7:p:1101-1121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.