IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v52y2009i8p993-1012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is legislation a barrier to the sustainable management of game species? A case study of wild deer in Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon Phillip
  • Norman Dandy
  • Robin Gill
  • Douglas MacMillan

Abstract

Wild game management for hunting in Western society has become increasingly complex as stakeholders have multiplied and as 'sustainability' influences the contemporary debate. This paper questions whether the current legal framework for game management, which has evolved from early European civilisations to focus on 'hunting rights', is relevant to regulate the contemporary environmental, social and economic dimensions of wild game and their management. Employing a narrative analysis to focus on deer, the study identifies key legislative tenets and highlights the pertinence of historical laws to contemporary conflicts. The analysis suggests that current legislation is increasingly divergent from contemporary trends and has created inertia with respect to sustainable deer management. The paper offers four options to redress this: state intervention; voluntary collaboration; financial incentives; and establishing a legal responsibility for management. It is concluded that significant innovation is required in one or more of these four areas to facilitate the contemporary sustainable management of wild deer in Britain.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon Phillip & Norman Dandy & Robin Gill & Douglas MacMillan, 2009. "Is legislation a barrier to the sustainable management of game species? A case study of wild deer in Britain," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(8), pages 993-1012.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:52:y:2009:i:8:p:993-1012
    DOI: 10.1080/09640560903327351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640560903327351
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640560903327351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:52:y:2009:i:8:p:993-1012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.