IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jeduce/v57y2026i1p53-66.html

Adapting and enhancing an individual choice classroom experiment for remote asynchronous delivery: A practical case study

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Olczak
  • Chris M. Wilson

Abstract

The emergence of online platforms offers many benefits for conducting classroom experiments, while also allowing them to be run under a remote, asynchronous delivery format. However, there is little existing guidance on conducting such asynchronous experiments or evidence about their advantages and disadvantages relative to synchronous, in-person experiments. To help, this article uses a case study to provide practical, step-by-step guidance on how to adapt an individual choice classroom experiment for asynchronous, remote delivery. Using two sets of example data, we then suggest that the asynchronous version can produce similar in-experiment decision-making to the synchronous, in-person approach, while also obtaining comparable student participation and engagement rates. Finally, we illustrate how the asynchronous approach can help instructors to run different treatments within class experiments more easily.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Olczak & Chris M. Wilson, 2026. "Adapting and enhancing an individual choice classroom experiment for remote asynchronous delivery: A practical case study," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 53-66, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:57:y:2026:i:1:p:53-66
    DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2025.2559670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220485.2025.2559670
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220485.2025.2559670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:57:y:2026:i:1:p:53-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/VECE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.