IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecmet/v29y2022i1p66-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lucas’ expectational equilibrium, price rigidity, and descriptive realism

Author

Listed:
  • Mauro Boianovsky

Abstract

Robert Lucas' ([1972b] 1981a) article on the neutrality of money represented the first effective challenge to Samuelson’s neoclassical synthesis methodological separation between static microeconomic optimisation and macroeconomic dynamics. Lucas rejected disequilibrium price dynamics, as expressed by the Walrasian tâtonnement and auctioneer mechanisms. Lucas’ new treatment of equilibrium as an expectational concept, determined by the rational behaviour of information processing agents, was not restricted to market clearing competitive economies. Lucas’ effort to compare alternative rational expectations models of price stickiness (including his 1972 original formulation) led him to stress the notion of descriptive realism of the models’ main assumptions, which played an important role in his original discussion of model robustness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauro Boianovsky, 2022. "Lucas’ expectational equilibrium, price rigidity, and descriptive realism," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 66-85, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:66-85
    DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2022.2033299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2022.2033299
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1350178X.2022.2033299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:66-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.