IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecmet/v27y2020i4p330-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power as an epistemological obstacle: Walter Eucken’s quest for an interest-proof economic science

Author

Listed:
  • Raphaël Fèvre

Abstract

Walter Eucken’s methodological program is usually related to the search for a meaningful synthesis between the general-theoretical and the individual-historical aspects of economic life. Yet, overcoming this ‘great antinomy’ was only a step in achieving the vital methodological task Eucken assigned to economists: answering the challenge raised by power issues. The paper shows why and how Eucken aimed at overcoming an epistemological obstacle consisting of the ideological veil placed by power groups over reality to favour their own interests. The introduction of this epistemological obstacle in Eucken’s methodological program is crucial for three reasons. First, it sheds light on another aspect of Eucken’s dissatisfaction with the Historical School, regarding both the Methodenstreit and Schmoller’s ethical postulate. Second, it contextualizes Eucken’s normative programme within the Weberian enterprise for a value-free science. Third, it shows that the ordoliberals’ politics regarding the dispersion of power was actually rooted in specific methodological foundations.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphaël Fèvre, 2020. "Power as an epistemological obstacle: Walter Eucken’s quest for an interest-proof economic science," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 330-350, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:27:y:2020:i:4:p:330-350
    DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2020.1789689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2020.1789689
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1350178X.2020.1789689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:27:y:2020:i:4:p:330-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.