IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecmet/v27y2020i1p36-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The normative decision theory in economics: a philosophy of science perspective. The case of the expected utility theory

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Małecka

Abstract

This article analyses how normative decision theory is understood by economists. The paradigmatic example of normative decision theory, discussed in the article, is the expected utility theory. It has been suggested that the status of the expected utility theory has been ambiguous since early in its history. The theory has been treated as descriptive, normative, or both. This observation is the starting point for the analysis presented here. The text discusses various ways in which economists and philosophers of economics have conceptualized the normative status of the expected utility theory, and it shows that none is satisfactory from the point of view of philosophy of science.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Małecka, 2020. "The normative decision theory in economics: a philosophy of science perspective. The case of the expected utility theory," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 36-50, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:36-50
    DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2019.1640891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1640891
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1640891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:36-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.