Structured causal pluralism in poverty analysis

This article illustrates Sheila Dow's notion of 'structured pluralism' drawing on a recent empirical body of literature in which multiple research, or 'Q-Squared', approaches to causal analysis of poverty analysis have been used in the Global South. It maintains that understanding linguistic differences between schools of thought is quite integral to methodologically-aware critique and to improved methodological practice. The various strands in the Q-super-2 literature together provide a case for methodological pluralism based on claims that knowledge is partial, empirical adjudication is imperfect, the world is complex and combining multiple research approaches adds value. The goals of understanding and explanation are best served if research questions dictate choice of methodological approach rather than the other way around.