IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecmet/v19y2012i4p375-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the positive--normative dichotomy: some remarks on Colander's Lost Art of Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Huei-chun Su

Abstract

In a series of articles later collected in his book The Lost Art of Economics , David Colander argues that the dichotomous distinction of positive and normative economics has misled economists into treating applied policy economics as part of positive economics and hence adopting the methodology of positive economics for applied policy analysis. Colander therefore urges a reintroduction of the art of economics and calls for a serious discussion on the appropriate methodology for applied policy work. This paper first explores some points not thoroughly examined by Colander in his arguments regarding the art of economics, in particular on its scope and the nature of judgements in the art of economics. It then examines the potential challenges to the tripartite division of economics, the presupposition of Colander's arguments for the art of economics, by examining, respectively, Tony Lawson's and Daniel Hausman's discussion on positive economics as a separate body of knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Huei-chun Su, 2012. "Beyond the positive--normative dichotomy: some remarks on Colander's Lost Art of Economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 375-390, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:19:y:2012:i:4:p:375-390
    DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2012.741690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2012.741690
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1350178X.2012.741690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:19:y:2012:i:4:p:375-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.