IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v62y2026i2p332-349.html

Confucianism and Imbalance in the Sex Ratio at Birth in Modern China

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Cao
  • Rongjie Chen
  • Minghao Li

Abstract

The male-biased imbalance in the sex ratio at birth (SRB) continues to pose a challenge to China and other developing countries. While previous studies mostly focus on policy and technological factors, we examine this issue from a cultural perspective. We find that Confucianism, measured by the density of imperial exam finalists (jinshi) in the Ming and Qing dynasties, has an exacerbating effect on the SRB imbalance in modern China. The result is qualitatively robust to using the distance to the nearest historical Confucius school (Zhu Xi Academy) as an instrumental variable. This finding remains robust when controlling for fertility rates and policies, clan culture, and other religions. The potential channels through which Confucianism affects SRB imbalance are also discussed. Specifically, we find suggestive evidence that Confucianism leads to SRB imbalance by reinforcing people’s gender attitudes and widening the gap between men’s and women’s educational attainment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Cao & Rongjie Chen & Minghao Li, 2026. "Confucianism and Imbalance in the Sex Ratio at Birth in Modern China," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(2), pages 332-349, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:62:y:2026:i:2:p:332-349
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2025.2563841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220388.2025.2563841
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2025.2563841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:62:y:2026:i:2:p:332-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.