IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v61y2025i6p970-988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employer and Employee Preferences for Worker Benefits: Evidence from a Matched Employer-Employee Survey in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Krishna B. Kumar
  • Minhaj Mahmud
  • Shanthi Nataraj
  • Yoonyoung Cho

Abstract

We study the working conditions of low-skilled workers in a developing country, Bangladesh, to shed light on the conditions workers value and employers may be willing to provide. Using a carefully designed choice experiment embedded in a unique survey of employers and employees, we elicit preferences for compensation, leave and termination policies, working hours, overtime pay, and accident compensation. Workers value termination notice and accident compensation, and employers are not averse to providing them. However, workers find long working hours without overtime compensation to be highly undesirable, whereas many employers are unwilling to provide shorter hours or overtime pay unless they face the threat of fines or are offered substantial incentives. Our findings suggest that encouraging the provision of termination notice and accident compensation may be relatively easy, but that increasing compliance with legal limits on working hours and overtime compensation is likely to require increased enforcement or substantial incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Krishna B. Kumar & Minhaj Mahmud & Shanthi Nataraj & Yoonyoung Cho, 2025. "Employer and Employee Preferences for Worker Benefits: Evidence from a Matched Employer-Employee Survey in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(6), pages 970-988, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:61:y:2025:i:6:p:970-988
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2025.2451868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220388.2025.2451868
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2025.2451868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:61:y:2025:i:6:p:970-988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.