IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v49y2013i1p56-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drawing the Line between State and Society: Social Movements, Participation and Autonomy in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Earle

Abstract

This article analyses the São Paulo Housing Movement's attempts to influence pro-poor housing policy in Brazil through a range of participatory arenas. Using the concept of ‘created’ and ‘invited’ spaces, it argues that where participants in such spaces are highly organised and politicised social movements, more complex interactions occur that cannot be captured by these labels. Here literature from the anthropology of the state canon can be more helpful. The paper draws on the idea of the invisible but moveable line between state and society, to examine how representatives of both movement and government struggle over where this boundary is best placed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Earle, 2013. "Drawing the Line between State and Society: Social Movements, Participation and Autonomy in Brazil," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 56-71, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:49:y:2013:i:1:p:56-71
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2012.685722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220388.2012.685722
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2012.685722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teresa Caldeira & James Holston, 2015. "Participatory urban planning in Brazil," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(11), pages 2001-2017, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:49:y:2013:i:1:p:56-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.