IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v18y2026i1p86-103.html

The Impact of Conditional Cash transfers on labour supply: new evidence from Brazil’s Bolsa Familia

Author

Listed:
  • Vinicius Gonçalves Vidigal

Abstract

This paper re-examines the labour market effects of Brazil’s Bolsa Familia using nine waves (2001–2009) of individual-level PNAD data and a fixed effects strategy that controls for census-tract unobservables, state-year shocks and tract-specific trends. In contrast to earlier tract-average studies, the individual specification reveals no significant change in aggregate labour force participation or weekly hours. Beneath this neutral mean, however, clear heterogeneity emerges: employment rises for women, for non-white adults and in rural areas, while a small but significant shift from formal to informal jobs is observed among urban men close to the eligibility threshold. The pattern is consistent with liquidity and child-substitution channels outweighing pure income effects, while the sharp means-test creates incentives for marginal formal workers to conceal earnings. Overall, Bolsa Familia does not discourage work; instead, it modestly expands employment among disadvantaged groups. These findings reinforce the programme’s value as a poverty-reduction and labour-activation tool, thereby supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals related to inclusive growth and effective social protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Vinicius Gonçalves Vidigal, 2026. "The Impact of Conditional Cash transfers on labour supply: new evidence from Brazil’s Bolsa Familia," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 86-103, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:86-103
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2025.2611036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2025.2611036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2025.2611036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:86-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.