IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v18y2026i1p47-62.html

‘Get three for the price of one’: evaluating the cost-effectiveness of multi-outcome interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Hernando Grueso
  • Chris Desmond
  • William E. Rudgard
  • Sopuruchukwu Obiesie
  • Lucie Cluver

Abstract

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) is widely used among policymakers due to its intuitive way of estimating the cost of an intervention per unit of outcome improvement. For interventions with multiple outcomes, however, this standard approach tends to underestimate programme efficiency. We propose a method to discount cost-effectiveness ratios (CER) based on multiple benefits and illustrate it using RCT findings from a violence-reduction programme in Liberia. The standard CER suggests a cost of $51.8 to improve economic performance by 0.1 SD among cash-transfer recipients, but our discounting approach reduces this to $5 once two additional outcomes are considered. Although these figures reflect only private benefits without considering positive externalities for society at large, accounting for multiple outcomes helps identify cross-sector synergies and compare the efficiency of interventions achieving similar results.

Suggested Citation

  • Hernando Grueso & Chris Desmond & William E. Rudgard & Sopuruchukwu Obiesie & Lucie Cluver, 2026. "‘Get three for the price of one’: evaluating the cost-effectiveness of multi-outcome interventions," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 47-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:47-62
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2025.2591638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2025.2591638
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2025.2591638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:47-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.