IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v15y2023i1p5-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The State of Cost-Effectiveness Guidance: Ten Best Resources for CEA in Impact Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Glandon
  • Sam Fishman
  • Caitlin Tulloch
  • Radhika Bhula
  • Grace Morgan
  • Shahana Hirji
  • Liz Brown

Abstract

Despite policymaker demand, cost evidence is infrequently included in impact evaluations (IEs) in LMICs. This article provides a curated list of resources for researchers and practitioners who would like to incorporate cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) into an IE. We identified 1402 resources through systematic searching of peer-reviewed and grey literature, crowd-sourcing and depersonalised Google keyword searches. Resources were screened over two rounds based on their relevance to guide or inform researchers seeking to incorporate CEA into an IE. The ‘10 best’ were selected based on their usefulness; user-friendliness ; generalisability across contexts; free availability online; and to balance resources across multiple stages of CEA implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Glandon & Sam Fishman & Caitlin Tulloch & Radhika Bhula & Grace Morgan & Shahana Hirji & Liz Brown, 2023. "The State of Cost-Effectiveness Guidance: Ten Best Resources for CEA in Impact Evaluations," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 5-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:5-16
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2022.2034916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2022.2034916
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2022.2034916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:5-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.