IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v9y2016i2p197-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The logic of practice in the practice of logics: practicing journalism and its relationship with business in times of technological changes

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Raviola
  • Paola Dubini

Abstract

This paper investigates the workings of institutional logics in practice, by focusing in particular on the interplay between material, practical and linguistic dimensions of practices. In other words, drawing on Bourdieu's sens pratique, the paper explores the logic of practice in the practice of logics through a six months full-time ethnographic study at Il Sole-24 Ore, the largest Italian financial newspaper, between 2007 and 2008. An original conceptual framework is developed to analyse how the logic of journalism is enacted vis-à-vis that of advertising in a setting in which an old technology for news production -- print newspaper -- coexists with a new one -- website -- and thus encounters between new and old technological possibilities make workings of institutional logics particularly visible. The findings point out different mechanisms of institutional work dealing with actions that, made possible by new technological possibilities, are potentially, but not necessarily classified as divergent from institutional logics.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Raviola & Paola Dubini, 2016. "The logic of practice in the practice of logics: practicing journalism and its relationship with business in times of technological changes," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 197-213, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:9:y:2016:i:2:p:197-213
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2015.1103773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2015.1103773
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2015.1103773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:9:y:2016:i:2:p:197-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.