IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v18y2025i5p736-752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested and captured: the paradox of Citywalk and digital disconnection in platformized China

Author

Listed:
  • Pengfei Fu

Abstract

This article critically examines Citywalk as a media-cultural practice among youth in China, foregrounding its contradictory role in the platform-mediated urban landscape. Based on ethnographic fieldwork including participant observation and 27 semi-structured interviews, it explores how Citywalk emerges as a form of resistance to the algorithmic commodification and spatial control inherent in platform capitalism. Citywalk participants attempt to reclaim time and space, cultivating disconnection from digital acceleration and reconnecting with the ‘nearby’ textures of urban life. However, this practice of disconnection is itself co-opted and datafied by the same platforms it seeks to resist, turning embodied experiences into algorithmically managed and commodified digital content. This paradox reveals how the romantic, political, and economic figures of the stroller converge in contemporary China’s platform urbanism: disconnection becomes a fleeting assertion of autonomy, yet is persistently captured by the commercial logics of digital platforms. The study highlights the fragile nature of cultural resistance within a political economy of algorithmic visibility and raises critical questions about the limits of urban autonomy and the enduring power of digital commodification in shaping everyday urban life.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengfei Fu, 2025. "Contested and captured: the paradox of Citywalk and digital disconnection in platformized China," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 736-752, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:736-752
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2025.2544883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2025.2544883
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2025.2544883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:736-752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.