IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v16y2023i2p183-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Karl Polanyi’s theory of fictitious commodification as a cultural political economy of institutionalization

Author

Listed:
  • Bonwoo Koo
  • Joo-Hyoung Ji

Abstract

This paper aims to offer a new reading of Karl Polanyi’s political economy by reinterpreting and reconstructing his institutional analysis as a cultural political economy that critiques capitalism as a historically specific symbolic system. For this purpose, it will draw on his earlier concepts from the socialist calculation debate to reinterpret Polanyi’s theory of fictitious commodification. In particular, it will examine how Polanyi conceptualized the symbolic structure of capitalism as an institutional articulation of particular economic facts, accounting concepts, and economic theory. Polanyi not only critiques the intrinsically cultural nature of foundational categories of the capitalist market economy such as profits, factors of production, and fictitious commodities but also shows how the gap between these categories and ‘the reality of society’ eventually brings about crises and crisis tendencies expressed in the ‘double movement’ and the ‘self-protection of society’. In this sense, Polanyi is a critical cultural political economist with contemporary relevance for the analysis of capitalism as a historically specific symbolic system in which culture plays both constitutive and ideological roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonwoo Koo & Joo-Hyoung Ji, 2023. "Karl Polanyi’s theory of fictitious commodification as a cultural political economy of institutionalization," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 183-202, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:183-202
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2022.2144413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2022.2144413
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2022.2144413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:183-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.