IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v15y2022i5p551-567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Playing Spotify’s game: artists’ approaches to playlisting in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Ignacio Siles
  • Amy Ross Arguedas
  • Mónica Sancho
  • Ricardo Solís-Quesada

Abstract

This paper examines recent transformations in music industries associated with platformization by privileging the perspectives, experiences, and voices of artists. We draw on in-depth interviews with 41 musicians based in two Latin American countries: Costa Rica and Mexico. We analyze how artists perceive the “power” and limitations of playlists, how they think playlists are transforming music industries, and how they associate various forms of pressure with this process. We then show that artists’ perceptions about these issues are not uniform but rather variable by discussing three logics that shape the meaning they attribute to Spotify and playlists: dominant, oppositional, and negotiated. Finally, the paper explains the factors that account for why musicians in these countries espouse these logics in different ways. The conclusion argues for considering platformization as more than a purely technological process that needs to be situated within the wider national histories and cultural configurations of the music industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ignacio Siles & Amy Ross Arguedas & Mónica Sancho & Ricardo Solís-Quesada, 2022. "Playing Spotify’s game: artists’ approaches to playlisting in Latin America," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 551-567, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:551-567
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2022.2058061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2022.2058061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2022.2058061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:551-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.