IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v15y2022i3p344-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Windows into the ethically made: affect, value, and the ‘pricing paradox’ in the maker movement

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Marotta

Abstract

This paper seeks to examine the ‘pricing paradox,’ an affective-ethical-economic conundrum encountered by small-scale urban craft producers known as ‘makers.’ Set within an industrialized producer-consumer imaginary, the pricing paradox captures a central frustration for makers: ‘ethical’ production inflates prices, consequently generating new ethical questions about accessibility. Unethical prices, in other words, are the cost of organizing one’s production around ethical values. Unable to meaningfully affect the pricing mechanism, makers have responded to this conundrum by seeking ways to open ‘windows’ into their production process, thereby extending an invitation to the consumer and stewarding affective attachments between producer-consumer and consumer-object. The idea is to change the value proposition between makers and consumers and shape an alternative value imaginary in which prices at least make more sense. Additionally, the paper seeks to situate affect more prominently in discourses on moral/ethical economies. As such, the paper uses feminist affect theory to think differently about defetishization, ethical production/consumption, and value more broadly. Finally, the paper concludes with a discussion on the politics of windows and their broader situation in the impasse of contemporary capitalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Marotta, 2022. "Windows into the ethically made: affect, value, and the ‘pricing paradox’ in the maker movement," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 344-357, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:344-357
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2022.2028650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2022.2028650
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2022.2028650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:344-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.