IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jbemgt/v14y2013isup1ps279-s312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple-unit franchising and performance outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Kelli Bodey
  • Scott Weaven
  • Debra Grace

Abstract

The economic and social contribution of franchising is widely reported. Although, most studies have examined franchising from the single-unit typology, multiple-unit franchising is found to be a popular and pervasive retailing strategy throughout the world. Despite this, there is a paucity of prior research examining the factors influencing the achievement of the four franchising imperatives. This represents an important gap in the organizational choice literature. Therefore, this study empirically examines the impact of the four franchising imperatives (i.e. unit growth, system uniformity, local responsiveness and system wide adaptation) (Bradach 1995) upon franchise system operational performance across the four key governance structures (i.e. master franchising, area development franchising, area representative franchising and incremental franchising). Based on a sample of 347 Australian franchisors, the findings indicate that there are significant differences in the way in which three of the four imperatives (i.e. unit growth, system uniformity and system-wide adaptation) impact on performance across different governance structures. Practical and managerial implications and future research direction are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelli Bodey & Scott Weaven & Debra Grace, 2013. "Multiple-unit franchising and performance outcomes," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(sup1), pages 279-312, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jbemgt:v:14:y:2013:i:sup1:p:s279-s312
    DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2012.711366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3846/16111699.2012.711366
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3846/16111699.2012.711366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jbemgt:v:14:y:2013:i:sup1:p:s279-s312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TBEM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.