IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jbemgt/v14y2013i3p500-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ERP adoption by public and private organizations -- a comparative analysis of successful implementations

Author

Listed:
  • Maria do Céu Alves
  • Sergio Ivo Amaral Matos

Abstract

The business environment has changed dramatically in the last years. The organizations are now more complex in terms of their structure and geographical dispersion. Daily, great amounts of information are produced and, to surpass these problems, organizations have invested in Enterprise Resource Planning systems (ERP). The same trends can be detected within the public sector. The interest generated by the ERP phenomenon is growing and the particularities of the public sector make specific studies necessary. Accordingly, the aim of this paper is to examine the adoption process of ERP systems by public and private organizations. Which ERP modules are mostly adopted? Which reasons legitimate ERP adoption? Using a survey research methodology, this study reveals that the need to increase the demand for real-time information, to obtain information for decision-making and the integration of applications appear as main reasons to implement an ERP system. Although the reasons given are the same for public and private organizations, the results of this study also show that the modules implemented are slightly different; the importance or dominance of each module may differ; and the deployment time is shorter in the public sector. Since comparative studies are relatively scarce, our work helps to reduce this knowledge gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria do Céu Alves & Sergio Ivo Amaral Matos, 2013. "ERP adoption by public and private organizations -- a comparative analysis of successful implementations," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 500-519, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jbemgt:v:14:y:2013:i:3:p:500-519
    DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2011.652979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3846/16111699.2011.652979
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3846/16111699.2011.652979?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jbemgt:v:14:y:2013:i:3:p:500-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TBEM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.