IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v52y2025i9p1742-1759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To impute or not? Testing multivariate normality on incomplete dataset: revisiting the BHEP test

Author

Listed:
  • Danijel G. Aleksić
  • Bojana Milošević

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on testing multivariate normality using the BHEP test with data that are missing completely at random. Our objective is twofold: first, to gain insight into the asymptotic behavior of the BHEP test statistics under two widely used approaches for handling missing data, namely complete-case analysis and imputation, and second, to compare the power performance of the test statistic under these approaches. Since complete-case approach removes all elements of the sample with at least one missing component, it might lead to the loss of information. On the other hand, we note that performing the test on imputed data as if they were complete, Type I error becomes severely distorted. To address these issues, we propose an appropriate bootstrap algorithm for approximating p-values. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate that both mean and median approaches exhibit greater power compared to testing with complete-case analysis, and open some questions for further research. The proposed methodology is illustrated with real-data examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Danijel G. Aleksić & Bojana Milošević, 2025. "To impute or not? Testing multivariate normality on incomplete dataset: revisiting the BHEP test," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(9), pages 1742-1759, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:52:y:2025:i:9:p:1742-1759
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2024.2438798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2024.2438798
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2024.2438798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:52:y:2025:i:9:p:1742-1759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.