IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v47y2020i13-15p2384-2420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best-subset model selection based on multitudinal assessments of likelihood improvements

Author

Listed:
  • Knute D. Carter
  • Joseph E. Cavanaugh

Abstract

A common model selection approach is to select the best model, according to some criterion, from among the collection of models defined by all possible subsets of the explanatory variables. Identifying an optimal subset has proven to be a challenging problem, both statistically and computationally. Our model selection procedure allows the researcher to nominate, a priori, the probability at which models containing false or spurious variables will be selected from among all possible subsets. The procedure determines whether inclusion of each candidate variable results in a sufficiently improved fitting term – and is hence named the SIFT procedure. Two variants are proposed: a naive method based on a set of restrictive assumptions and an empirical permutation-based method. Properties of these methods are investigated within the standard linear modeling framework and performance is evaluated against other model selection techniques. The SIFT procedure behaves as designed – asymptotically selecting variables that characterize the underlying data generating mechanism, while limiting selection of spurious variables to the desired level. The SIFT methodology offers researchers a promising new approach to model selection, providing the ability to control the probability of selecting a model that includes spurious variables to a level based on the context of the application.

Suggested Citation

  • Knute D. Carter & Joseph E. Cavanaugh, 2020. "Best-subset model selection based on multitudinal assessments of likelihood improvements," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(13-15), pages 2384-2420, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:47:y:2020:i:13-15:p:2384-2420
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1645097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2019.1645097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2019.1645097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:47:y:2020:i:13-15:p:2384-2420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.