IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v46y2019i5p853-873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of propensity score methods for estimating average treatment effects with multi-level treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Nian
  • Chang Yu
  • Juan Ding
  • Huiyun Wu
  • William D. Dupont
  • Steve Brunwasser
  • Tebeb Gebretsadik
  • Tina V. Hartert
  • Pingsheng Wu

Abstract

The propensity score (PS) method is widely used to estimate the average treatment effect (TE) in observational studies. However, it is generally confined to the binary treatment assignment. In an extension to the settings of a multi-level treatment, Imbens proposed a generalized propensity score which is the conditional probability of receiving a particular level of the treatment given pre-treatment variables. The average TE can then be estimated by conditioning solely on the generalized PS under the assumption of weak unconfoundedness. In the present work, we adopted this approach and conducted extensive simulations to evaluate the performance of several methods using the generalized PS, including subclassification, matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and covariate adjustment. Compared with other methods, IPTW had the preferred overall performance. We then applied these methods to a retrospective cohort study of 228,876 pregnant women. The impact of the exposure to different types of the antidepressant medications (no exposure, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) only, non-SSRI only, and both) during pregnancy on several important infant outcomes (birth weight, gestation age, preterm labor, and respiratory distress) were assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Nian & Chang Yu & Juan Ding & Huiyun Wu & William D. Dupont & Steve Brunwasser & Tebeb Gebretsadik & Tina V. Hartert & Pingsheng Wu, 2019. "Performance evaluation of propensity score methods for estimating average treatment effects with multi-level treatments," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 853-873, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:46:y:2019:i:5:p:853-873
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2018.1523375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2018.1523375
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2018.1523375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:46:y:2019:i:5:p:853-873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.