IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v46y2019i14p2491-2513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tests for homogeneity of risk differences in stratified design with correlated bilateral data

Author

Listed:
  • Shi-Fang Qiu
  • Li-Xuan Guo
  • G. Y. Zou
  • Dan Yu

Abstract

Correlated bilateral data arise from stratified studies involving paired body organs in a subject. When it is desirable to conduct inference on the scale of risk difference, one needs first to assess the assumption of homogeneity in risk differences across strata. For testing homogeneity of risk differences, we herein propose eight methods derived respectively from weighted-least-squares (WLS), the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) estimator, the WLS method in combination with inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation, and the test statistics based on their log-transformation, the modified Score test statistic and Likelihood ratio test statistic. Simulation results showed that four of the tests perform well in general, with the tests based on the WLS method and inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation always performing satisfactorily even under small sample size designs. The methods are illustrated with a dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi-Fang Qiu & Li-Xuan Guo & G. Y. Zou & Dan Yu, 2019. "Tests for homogeneity of risk differences in stratified design with correlated bilateral data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(14), pages 2491-2513, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:46:y:2019:i:14:p:2491-2513
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1601162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2019.1601162
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2019.1601162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhiming Li & Changxing Ma & Keyi Mou, 2023. "Testing the common risk difference of proportions for stratified uni‐ and bilateral correlated data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(3), pages 340-364, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:46:y:2019:i:14:p:2491-2513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.