IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v44y2017i8p1466-1478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of dichotomized and distributional approaches in rare event clinical trial design: a fixed Bayesian design

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Lei
  • Susan Carlson
  • Lisa N. Yelland
  • Maria Makrides
  • Robert Gibson
  • Byron J. Gajewski

Abstract

This research was motivated by our goal to design an efficient clinical trial to compare two doses of docosahexaenoic acid supplementation for reducing the rate of earliest preterm births (ePTB) and/or preterm births (PTB). Dichotomizing continuous gestational age (GA) data using a classic binomial distribution will result in a loss of information and reduced power. A distributional approach is an improved strategy to retain statistical power from the continuous distribution. However, appropriate distributions that fit the data properly, particularly in the tails, must be chosen, especially when the data are skewed. A recent study proposed a skew-normal method. We propose a three-component normal mixture model and introduce separate treatment effects at different components of GA. We evaluate operating characteristics of mixture model, beta-binomial model, and skew-normal model through simulation. We also apply these three methods to data from two completed clinical trials from the USA and Australia. Finite mixture models are shown to have favorable properties in PTB analysis but minimal benefit for ePTB analysis. Normal models on log-transformed data have the largest bias. Therefore we recommend finite mixture model for PTB study. Either finite mixture model or beta-binomial model is acceptable for ePTB study.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Lei & Susan Carlson & Lisa N. Yelland & Maria Makrides & Robert Gibson & Byron J. Gajewski, 2017. "Comparison of dichotomized and distributional approaches in rare event clinical trial design: a fixed Bayesian design," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1466-1478, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:44:y:2017:i:8:p:1466-1478
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1214244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2016.1214244
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2016.1214244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:44:y:2017:i:8:p:1466-1478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.