IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v44y2017i3p554-570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elite players’ perceptions of football playing surfaces: a mixed effects ordinal logistic regression model of players’ perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • A. Owen
  • A. C. Smith
  • P. Osei-Owusu
  • A. Harland
  • J. R. Roberts

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine potential explanatory factors that may be associated with different attitudes amongst the global population of elite footballers to the use of different surfaces for football. A questionnaire was used to capture elite football players’ perceptions of playing surfaces and a mixed effects ordinal logistic regression model was used to explore potential explanatory factors of players’ perceptions. In total, responses from 1129 players from 44 different countries were analysed. The majority of players expressed a strong preference for the use of Natural Turf pitches over alternatives such as Artificial Turf. The regression model, with a players’ country as a random effect, indicated that players were less favourable towards either Natural Turf or Artificial Turf where there was perceived to be greater variability in surface qualities or the surface was perceived to have less desirable properties. Player’s surface experience was also linked to their overall attitudes, with a suggestion that the quality of the Natural Turf surface players experienced dictated players’ support for Artificial Turf.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Owen & A. C. Smith & P. Osei-Owusu & A. Harland & J. R. Roberts, 2017. "Elite players’ perceptions of football playing surfaces: a mixed effects ordinal logistic regression model of players’ perceptions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 554-570, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:554-570
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1177500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2016.1177500
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2016.1177500?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:554-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.