IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v41y2014i5p1091-1104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verification bias on sensitivity and specificity measurements in diagnostic medicine: a comparison of some approaches used for correction

Author

Listed:
  • İlker �nal
  • H. Refik Burgut

Abstract

Verification bias may occur when the test results of not all subjects are verified by using a gold standard. The correction for this bias can be made using different approaches depending on whether missing gold standard test results are random or not. Some of these approaches with binary test and gold standard results include the correction method by Begg and Greenes, lower and upper limits for diagnostic measurements by Zhou, logistic regression method, multiple imputation method, and neural networks. In this study, all these approaches are compared by employing a real and simulated data under different conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • İlker �nal & H. Refik Burgut, 2014. "Verification bias on sensitivity and specificity measurements in diagnostic medicine: a comparison of some approaches used for correction," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 1091-1104, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:41:y:2014:i:5:p:1091-1104
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2013.862217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2013.862217
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2013.862217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:41:y:2014:i:5:p:1091-1104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.