IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/irapec/v37y2023i1p23-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The state's response to the crisis of neoliberalism: a comparison of the net social wage in China and the United States, 1992-2017

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine A. Moos
  • Hao Qi

Abstract

We compare the welfare states and taxation regimes of the two largest economies in the world, China and the United States, from 1992 to 2017. We begin with a comparison of each country’s net social wage – that is, the difference between total benefits received by and taxes paid by labor – using two established methods. While the net social wage in the two countries exhibited similar trends, the increasing net social wage has distinctly different implications in the two countries due to their specific historical trajectories in the neoliberal era. In the US, the increasing net social wage reflects an ambivalent and reluctant response to workers’ social reproduction. In China, it reflects institutional changes in the welfare state, which we interpret as the Chinese state’s attempt to resolve the social-reproduction crisis caused by neoliberal reforms of the 1990s.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine A. Moos & Hao Qi, 2023. "The state's response to the crisis of neoliberalism: a comparison of the net social wage in China and the United States, 1992-2017," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 23-49, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:37:y:2023:i:1:p:23-49
    DOI: 10.1080/02692171.2022.2056155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02692171.2022.2056155
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02692171.2022.2056155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:37:y:2023:i:1:p:23-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIRA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.