IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/irapec/v34y2020i4p423-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pitfalls of participation: explaining why a strike followed unprecedented employee dividend pay-outs at a South African mine

Author

Listed:
  • Andries Bezuidenhout
  • Christine Bischoff
  • John Mashayamombe

Abstract

This paper attempts to provide explanations for why a spectacular strike (in 2012) at Kumba Iron Ore’s Sishen mine followed after the highest Employee Share Ownership Programme (ESOP) linked pay-out of dividends to workers in South African history. It is argued that a hidden transcript challenged the company’s official version of the ESOP and that some workers saw a political opportunity shortly after the events at Marikana and subsequent wage dispute settlements outside the ordinary collective bargaining procedures. The context for this was an approach to ESOPs that involved shares held in trust, but funded by loans dependent on future income, as well as contestation over the ownership of mineral rights at the mine by a politically influential rival firm. To this end, the ESOP was politicised in public debates. The situation was aggravated by a divided union branch. The functioning of the ESOP and how workers experienced it are analysed by means of publically available documents and primary research. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the case study for ESOPs in the mining industry as a form of ownership diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Andries Bezuidenhout & Christine Bischoff & John Mashayamombe, 2020. "Pitfalls of participation: explaining why a strike followed unprecedented employee dividend pay-outs at a South African mine," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 423-438, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:34:y:2020:i:4:p:423-438
    DOI: 10.1080/02692171.2020.1773639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02692171.2020.1773639
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02692171.2020.1773639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:34:y:2020:i:4:p:423-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIRA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.