IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v23y2023i3p612-628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Big houses on a small island: legislating Singapore’s ‘good class’ bungalows

Author

Listed:
  • Edward S. W. Ti

Abstract

Land reform in post-independent Singapore was led by compulsory purchase predominantly in the 1960s–70s and resulted in numerous kampungs or villages being demolished. With efficient assembly of land, high-rise public flats were built to accommodate the country’s burgeoning population. Today, 95 per cent of residents reside in high-rise dwellings and Singapore is the 3rd most densely populated country globally. Remarkably, planning regulations protect a housing typology known as ‘good class bungalows’ (GCBs). Though housing less than 0.2 per cent of Singapore households, GCBs collectively take up 7 per cent of the available land for housing. Numbering less than three thousand, GCBs have statutorily required large minimum lot sizes and are situated in Singapore’s choiciest residential enclaves. Development of GCB land to more intensive use is strictly prohibited. In this article, I examine the legal policies and socioeconomic rationale for maintaining this uniquely Singaporean institution, concluding that there are indeed cogent justifications for its existence.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward S. W. Ti, 2023. "Big houses on a small island: legislating Singapore’s ‘good class’ bungalows," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 612-628, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:23:y:2023:i:3:p:612-628
    DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2022.2105193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19491247.2022.2105193
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19491247.2022.2105193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:23:y:2023:i:3:p:612-628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.