IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v22y2022i4p578-594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing provision structures and the changing roles of actors in urban China since 1949

Author

Listed:
  • Ruixia Chao
  • Rita Schneider-Sliwa

Abstract

Most reviews of housing policy in China have focussed on the housing reform policies of 1979 and their consequences, and scant attention has been paid to the housing system before the reform. This is despite the fact that the welfare housing provision in the 1949–1979 period affected the housing tenure structure in ways that continued to be felt up to the late 1990s. By identifying the functions of actors within the three different housing systems that have existed since 1949, this case-based study of the city of Guangzhou explores how different degrees of government intervention affected housing outcomes. The changes that occurred over the periods were characterised by the development of the housing market and the withdrawal of government controls. The study finds that a system in which the government plays a consistently dominant role in the regulation of land use allows for the provision of affordable housing, whereas a market-oriented housing system combined with social housing supplied by the government tends to effectively improve residential environments. Consequently, different degrees of government intervention may lead to different kinds of stratification in the tenure structure, determined either by individuals’ social status or their economic capability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruixia Chao & Rita Schneider-Sliwa, 2022. "Housing provision structures and the changing roles of actors in urban China since 1949," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 578-594, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:22:y:2022:i:4:p:578-594
    DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2021.1978249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19491247.2021.1978249
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19491247.2021.1978249?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:22:y:2022:i:4:p:578-594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.