IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v21y2021i4p505-533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowerment or responsibility? Collective finance for slum upgrading in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Hayden Shelby

Abstract

The Baan Mankong (‘Secure Housing’) programme of Thailand has been heralded as a model of participatory slum upgrading. Many scholars have praised its participatory and community-based processes, as well as its success in terms of going to scale. The celebration of the programme emphasises its particular model of housing finance, which includes community savings, housing cooperatives, and collective loans for physical upgrading provided through a government agency. This financial model, along with the collective and participatory processes it employs, form the foundation of the programme’s claims to ‘empowerment.’ In this article, I offer a sympathetic critique of Baan Mankong by analysing how this financial model actually plays out on the ground through an in-depth ethnographic study of the policy and its participants. I conclude that, despite the policy’s intentions to empower communities through access to collective finance, many participants find themselves struggling with debt and living under a new form of financialised community that reshapes their social relations with neighbours and burdens them with the responsibility for financing and carrying out development desired by the state.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayden Shelby, 2021. "Empowerment or responsibility? Collective finance for slum upgrading in Thailand," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 505-533, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:21:y:2021:i:4:p:505-533
    DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2020.1840906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19491247.2020.1840906
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19491247.2020.1840906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:21:y:2021:i:4:p:505-533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.