IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v26y2026i2p234-256.html

Beneficial or harmful? Finns’ perceptions of the consequences of their gambling on relationships, health, and finances

Author

Listed:
  • Kalle Lind
  • Jussi Palomäki
  • Tanja Grönroos
  • Anne H. Salonen

Abstract

Gambling can result in benefits and harm, yet their relationship and underlying predictors remain inadequately understood. Using data from the Finnish Gambling 2023 population survey (N = 5,977), this study examines to what extent Finnish gamblers self-report gambling as beneficial or harmful. We examined associations between sociodemographic and gambling behavior-related variables and harms and benefits across three domains: relationships, health, and finance. Binary logistic regression models were used. The majority of respondents evaluated their gambling as having neither benefits nor harms for health (93.1%), finances (85.2%), and relationships (90.8%), respectively. While examining the extremes of the rating scale, 10.2% rated their gambling financially harmful while 4.6% perceived it as beneficial. Conversely, from the perspective of health and, particularly, relationships, gambling was rated more beneficial than harmful. Deviations from neutrality, positive and negative, were most common among those with frequent and at-risk gambling based on Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) scores. Findings suggest that experiencing benefits from gambling is associated with experiencing harms and having higher PGSI scores. Although these findings describe co-occurring self-reported evaluations rather than directional or causal relationships, our results support the view that gambling is an atypical consumer product, inherently risky even when perceived as beneficial to the individual.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalle Lind & Jussi Palomäki & Tanja Grönroos & Anne H. Salonen, 2026. "Beneficial or harmful? Finns’ perceptions of the consequences of their gambling on relationships, health, and finances," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 234-256, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:234-256
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2026.2683624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2026.2683624
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2026.2683624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:234-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.