IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v26y2026i1p1-17.html

Understanding consumer perceptions and sub-group differences in intent to use account-based (‘cashless’) gambling payment systems

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Lockwood
  • Teejay Santos
  • Dilushi Chandrakumar
  • Sally M. Gainsbury

Abstract

Account-based cashless payment systems offer a promising tool to reduce gambling harm from electronic gaming machines (EGM), support lower-risk gambling and prevent money laundering; however, little research exists to inform their implementation. Awareness of consumer insights is essential for policymakers and industry operators aiming to develop and implement account-based systems. This preliminary study involved EGM consumers (N = 133, aged 19–82) from a venue in Western Sydney, Australia who completed an online survey. Findings supported the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): perceived usefulness and ease-of-use significantly predicted intention-to-use account-based systems, while perceived ease-of-use significantly predicted perceived usefulness. Neither financial wellbeing nor likelihood of experiencing a gambling problem predicted perceived usefulness. This study is the first theory-driven examination of factors predicting engagement with a novel gambling system requiring identification to assist venues in identifying money laundering and gambling harms. If account-based EGM systems are introduced in a voluntary basis, communication campaigns are likely needed to enhance positive perceptions of the features of an account-based system in terms of ease-of-use and the specific advantages for individuals. Supporting customers with initial onboarding is also recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Lockwood & Teejay Santos & Dilushi Chandrakumar & Sally M. Gainsbury, 2026. "Understanding consumer perceptions and sub-group differences in intent to use account-based (‘cashless’) gambling payment systems," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:26:y:2026:i:1:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2025.2558556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2025.2558556
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2025.2558556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:26:y:2026:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.