Author
Listed:
- Alexander J. Connolly
- Frank Nieblas
- Heather Chapman
- Shane W. Kraus
- Joshua B. Grubbs
Abstract
Armed forces veterans are at risk of gambling-related problems and harms. Relatively few studies have examined how individual differences in this population might be related to specific gambling problems. The present work examines how facets of impulsivity (derived from the UPPS-P model of impulsivity) relate to problem gambling severity, gambling-related cognitions, and gambling preferences. The sample consisted of US Armed Forces Veterans receiving inpatient treatment for Gambling Disorder in a Veterans Affairs hospital (N = 549; Mean Age[SD] = 53.55[11.4], 78.3% Men). Analyses revealed that higher levels of sensation seeking and lower levels of negative urgency were associated with being a purely strategic gambler (relative to purely non-strategic). Similarly, even in this extremely clinically severe sample, greater levels of sensation seeking, greater lack of perseverance, and greater negative urgency were associated with greater gambling symptom severity. Finally, greater positive urgency was consistently related to all forms of erroneous gambling beliefs and gambling related cognitive distortions as measured by the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale. These findings underscore the potential clinical utility of targeting specific impulsivity traits in assessment and intervention strategies. Similarly, findings may inform structural efforts to tailor prevention and treatment approaches for veterans with gambling disorder.
Suggested Citation
Alexander J. Connolly & Frank Nieblas & Heather Chapman & Shane W. Kraus & Joshua B. Grubbs, 2025.
"Beliefs, behaviors, and bets: impulsivity in veterans receiving inpatient treatment for gambling disorder,"
International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 532-547, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:intgms:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:532-547
DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2025.2539341
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:532-547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.