IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v25y2025i2p291-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The minimal important change of the gambling symptom assessment scale among individuals experiencing gambling problems who underwent self-help internet interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Ryuhei So
  • Berend Terluin
  • Yoshitake Takebayashi
  • Kengo Yokomitsu
  • Yasushi Tsujimoto
  • Toshiaki Furukawa

Abstract

The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS) is one of the most common treatment outcome measures to assess gambling symptom severity. For clinicians and patients to interpret whether the observed changes in G-SAS scores are meaningful, we need to determine the minimal important change (MIC) – the smallest change in score that patients perceive as important. To estimate the MIC of G-SAS, we analyzed data from 281 participants in two randomized controlled trials of Internet interventions for problem gambling. Participants completed the G-SAS both at baseline and 1 week later and rated their perceived change in gambling symptoms. We estimated the MIC using four approaches based on mean change scores, receiver operating characteristic curves, predictive modeling, and adjusted predictive modeling. When asked the anchor question about symptom changes 1 week after baseline, 52% of participants reported improvement. The MIC estimates ranged from 2.1 to 7.0 points across different approaches. Based on the predictive MIC (3.8, 95% CI 3.2 to 4.4) and adjusted predictive MIC (3.8, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.8), which are expected to be more unbiased than the others, we recommend a four-point reduction as the MIC of the G-SAS.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryuhei So & Berend Terluin & Yoshitake Takebayashi & Kengo Yokomitsu & Yasushi Tsujimoto & Toshiaki Furukawa, 2025. "The minimal important change of the gambling symptom assessment scale among individuals experiencing gambling problems who underwent self-help internet interventions," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 291-306, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:25:y:2025:i:2:p:291-306
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2025.2481839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2025.2481839
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2025.2481839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:25:y:2025:i:2:p:291-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.