IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v25y2025i1p192-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting gambling research contributors’ use and views of open science principles and practices: a brief report

Author

Listed:
  • Debi A. LaPlante
  • Eric R. Louderback
  • Kasra Ghaharian
  • Brett Abarbanel

Abstract

Open science practices, such as research pre-registration and open data access, are designed to protect against threats to research integrity and promote the acceleration of science. Yet, for many academic disciplines, including gambling studies, the use of these practices remains limited and often in need of improvement. This brief report provides new information about how the use of such practices has changed during the past 5 years. In a survey of 65 gambling studies research stakeholders who had attended a major international gambling studies conference in May 2023, we observed that a majority reported engaging in these practices, but minorities reported doing so for any particular practice. Holding more perceived benefits of open science was associated with a greater likelihood of using those practices in research. Comparisons with a sample of stakeholders from 2019 indicated some increases in open science practices, and areas in need of improvement. These and other findings provide guidance for boosting support for the use of open science principles and practices in gambling studies research.

Suggested Citation

  • Debi A. LaPlante & Eric R. Louderback & Kasra Ghaharian & Brett Abarbanel, 2025. "Revisiting gambling research contributors’ use and views of open science principles and practices: a brief report," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 192-203, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:192-203
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2025.2456797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2025.2456797
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2025.2456797?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:192-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.