IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v22y2022i3p390-411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between casino resort employee department and responsible gambling program perceptions: a three-year follow-up study

Author

Listed:
  • Brett Abarbanel
  • Tiange Xu
  • Shane Kraus
  • Heather M. Gray
  • Eric R. Louderback
  • Debi LaPlante
  • Bo Bernhard

Abstract

This study presents results from a third wave of data collection of a longitudinal project investigating implementation of an RG program, GameSense, at MGM Resorts International (MGM), and how casino employees perceive responsible gambling (RG) efforts. Survey data at three time periods – Year 1 (baseline, N = 2,192), Year 2 (one-year follow-up, N = 852) and Year 3 (two-year follow-up, N = 1,114) – measured MGM employees’ (1) perceptions of RG program effectiveness, (2) gambling misconceptions, and (3) perceived company support. We conducted a one-way MANCOVA on Year 3 data, with gambling industry tenure as the covariate, and a two-way MANCOVA to examine the interaction and main effects of department of employment and time period. In Year 3, Front of House Casino employees were more likely than their colleagues to perceive RG programs as effective, suggesting they can play a valuable role in refining internal program content and delivery. In investigating year-over-year changes, both perceived program effectiveness and perceived company support were lower in Year 3 than in Years 1 and 2. GameSense is designed to be part of company culture, and fluctuations in year-over-year findings suggest RG cultural change should be viewed as a long-term goal, not necessarily achieved immediately after initial program launch.

Suggested Citation

  • Brett Abarbanel & Tiange Xu & Shane Kraus & Heather M. Gray & Eric R. Louderback & Debi LaPlante & Bo Bernhard, 2022. "Association between casino resort employee department and responsible gambling program perceptions: a three-year follow-up study," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 390-411, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:22:y:2022:i:3:p:390-411
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2021.2007976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2021.2007976
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2021.2007976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:22:y:2022:i:3:p:390-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.