IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v22y2022i2p282-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problem video gaming in adolescents: An examination of the Pathways Model

Author

Listed:
  • Loredana A. Marchica
  • Jérémie Richard
  • Lia Nower
  • William Ivoska
  • Jeffrey L. Derevensky

Abstract

Problem video gaming (PVG) is of significant concern among youth and contributes to increases in mental health issues among adolescents. Prevalence rates for PVG are estimated at 1-3% among non-clinical samples. Like problem gambling, it has been hypothesized that individuals reporting PVG are part of a heterogeneous group with different profiles, dependent on specific psychosocial factors. Identifying these profiles allows clinicians to create targeted interventions. The following preliminary study aimed to identify the emotional and behavioral characteristics that distinguish between subgroups of adolescents reporting PVG and how these subgroups compare to those proposed by the Pathways Model. The study included a cross-sectional sample of 288 adolescents reporting PVG from a Midwestern state. Measures included the Ohio Problem Severity Scales, the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-SF, and frequency of video gaming. A latent class analysis identified four classes which aligned with the subgroups proposed by the Pathways Model (i.e. behavioral conditioned, emotionally vulnerable, and antisocial/impulsivist), and two additional classes which could be considered as milder variants of the emotionally vulnerable and antisocial/impulsivist groups. These results suggest that adolescents reporting PVG form a heterogeneous group, with each profile requiring different considerations in developing targeted interventions. Implications for prevention and future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Loredana A. Marchica & Jérémie Richard & Lia Nower & William Ivoska & Jeffrey L. Derevensky, 2022. "Problem video gaming in adolescents: An examination of the Pathways Model," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 282-299, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:22:y:2022:i:2:p:282-299
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2022.2055110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2022.2055110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2022.2055110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:22:y:2022:i:2:p:282-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.