IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intecj/v40y2026i2p358-389.html

Do FDI Restrictions Impair Outward FDI? Evidence from Indian Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Munmi Saikia

Abstract

Driven by persistent scepticism about FDI, many countries adopt protectionist measures – regulatory restrictions being a key tool. This study argues that such restrictions hinder FDI, raising the key question: do FDI regulatory restrictions impede the flow of outward FDI (OFDI)? Building on Melitz-type heterogeneous firm models [Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725; Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American economic review, 94(1), 300–316], the study examines how regulatory restriction influences Indian OFDI. Using firm-level bilateral data on Indian OFDI and the OECD's FDI regulatory restrictiveness index, the analysis reveals that OFDI does not respond uniformly to restrictions – equity limits, screening requirements, and personnel rules have varying effects. Additionally, a battery of heterogeneity checks is conducted to examine how foreign ownership decisions, sector-specific and cross-sectoral restrictions, and the North–South divide interact with regulatory barriers to influence OFDI. Results show that service-sector restrictions are particularly deterrent. The findings confirm strong sectoral complementarity and a pronounced North–South divide in regulatory sensitivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Munmi Saikia, 2026. "Do FDI Restrictions Impair Outward FDI? Evidence from Indian Firms," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 358-389, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:358-389
    DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2026.2647749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10168737.2026.2647749
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10168737.2026.2647749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:358-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIEJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.