IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intecj/v39y2025i4p676-719.html

Does Faculty Gender Composition Matter for Retaining Students in Their Major After College Graduation?

Author

Listed:
  • Jihye Kam

Abstract

There is a widely held belief that female faculty serve as valuable role models for female students, yet prior research reports mixed effects on academic and labor market outcomes. This study examines whether the proportion of female faculty within undergraduate major programs influences graduates’ likelihood of remaining in their field – through either postgraduate study or field-related employment – using nationally representative data from South Korea. Results indicate that a higher female faculty share is associated with a lower probability of pursuing graduate education for both men and women. However, female faculty representation significantly increases the likelihood that women, but not men, remain in their undergraduate field. Effects are highly discipline-specific, with positive associations in education, engineering, and biology/food science, but negative ones in medicine/pharmacy. These findings suggest that female faculty can strengthen women’s post-graduation field alignment, yet the influence varies substantially across disciplines. The results highlight the need for field-targeted policies to promote gender equity in academia, recognizing that the role-model effect may be context-dependent and, in some cases, countervailing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jihye Kam, 2025. "Does Faculty Gender Composition Matter for Retaining Students in Their Major After College Graduation?," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 676-719, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:676-719
    DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2025.2575179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10168737.2025.2575179
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10168737.2025.2575179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:676-719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIEJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.