IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intecj/v39y2025i2p357-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Skills and Labor Market Performance in Korea: An International Comparison Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ga Woon Ban
  • Hyeran Choi

Abstract

This study presents an international comparison of relations between skills and labor market performance. Human capital theory emphasizes that skills have a positive effect on labor market performance, which is evident in most countries. However, skill levels do not have a positive impact on employability and wage in South Korea, unlike other OECD countries. Using data from the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), we analyze how various skill dimensions influence employment outcomes and wage levels. The skills measured in PIAAC are plausible values. Therefore, our methodology entails estimating regression coefficients and presenting the final estimates as the averages of these coefficients. Standard errors are computed through repeated sampling using the jackknife technique. The findings of this study indicate that policies focusing solely on the supply side of skills, such as expanding education and training, may have a limited impact on improving employment and wages in Korean labor market. While human capital investment remains crucial for labor market outcomes, the results suggest that Korea could achieve greater effectiveness by complementing these efforts with workplace innovation policies aimed at increasing the demand for skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Ga Woon Ban & Hyeran Choi, 2025. "Skills and Labor Market Performance in Korea: An International Comparison Perspective," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 357-382, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:357-382
    DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2025.2463372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10168737.2025.2463372
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10168737.2025.2463372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:357-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIEJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.