IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v33y2026i4p516-537.html

Sticky partnerships or fresh starts? How failed project applications shape organisations’ collaborative behaviour in R&D networks

Author

Listed:
  • Dima Yankova
  • Pablo D’Este

Abstract

Prior inter-organisational collaboration is a well-established antecedent of tie formation in competitive publicly funded R&D networks. But what happens when organisations come together to develop a project proposal and apply for funding, but their application is unsuccessful? This paper investigates how the joint experience of failure influences future tie formation, and how this effect varies for organisations with different levels of cognitive proximity. The analysis builds on a policy-induced collaborative network of approved and rejected R&D project proposals in Valencia region (Spain), in 2016 – 2022. The findings suggest that unsuccessful funding applications have a positive and stronger influence on partners’ future tie formation than successful ones. Moreover, the propensity of actors to re-engage following a rejection is greater if they are cognitively distant. The paper demonstrates that empirical work on R&D network dynamics may be systematically underrating partners’ prior funding application failures as a fundamental antecedent of tie formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dima Yankova & Pablo D’Este, 2026. "Sticky partnerships or fresh starts? How failed project applications shape organisations’ collaborative behaviour in R&D networks," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 516-537, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:516-537
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2025.2514464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2025.2514464
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2025.2514464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:516-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.