IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v33y2026i4p470-492.html

Relatedness diffuses impacts from automation: a novel approach to estimate job risk in U.S. cities

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Farinha

Abstract

Modern Robotics, artificial intelligence and other new technologies are changing the workforce landscape worldwide. They threaten some jobs and improve some other jobs, directly and indirectly. When workers get automated, some of their co-workers might become more productive and higher in demand. Some other co-workers might instead become more prone to getting automated too, as the new technology develops further. This paper empirically investigates how automatable jobs have affected their neighbouring jobs in North American cities between 2007 and 2016. Results indicate that impacts of new technologies can be positive or negative depending on how occupations relate to each other. More concretely, occupations that share similarities with neighbouring high-risk occupations grew less, even when controlling for their own technical risk of automation. Conversely, occupations that share complementarities with neighbouring high-risk occupations grew more, possibly indicating productivity gains from working with recently automated jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Farinha, 2026. "Relatedness diffuses impacts from automation: a novel approach to estimate job risk in U.S. cities," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 470-492, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:470-492
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2025.2499523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2025.2499523
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2025.2499523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:470-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.