IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v33y2026i3p379-410.html

Beyond business as usual? How organisations navigate tensions between circular economy and intellectual property right strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanna Capponi
  • Carolina Castaldi
  • Laura Piscicelli

Abstract

Intellectual property rights (IPRs) play a key role in the business strategies of innovators, hence also for companies innovating towards a circular economy (CE). IPRs can allow circular companies to benefit economically from their innovations but can also create tensions with their CE ambitions. However, a clear picture of such tensions and the way circular companies deal with them is missing. Our exploratory research aims to fill this gap by conducting in-depth qualitative interviews with frontrunner circular companies. Our results show that many firms experienced no tension between their CE and IPR strategies. If they did experience tensions, they found strategies to suppress, accept or resolve them. Instances where firms responded to tensions by clearly deviating from usual IPR strategies were rare. These findings suggest that most circular innovators embrace a ‘business case’ approach to circularity, which might limit the impact and transformative promises of a CE.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanna Capponi & Carolina Castaldi & Laura Piscicelli, 2026. "Beyond business as usual? How organisations navigate tensions between circular economy and intellectual property right strategies," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 379-410, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:379-410
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2024.2449262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2024.2449262
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2024.2449262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:379-410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.