IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v32y2025i6p685-709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Path dependency, social capital and the geography of dirty inventions

Author

Listed:
  • Gianluca Biggi
  • Elisa Giuliani
  • Arianna Martinelli
  • Angela Parenti

Abstract

Dirty inventions are technologies inherently designed with features that pose significant risks to both human health and the environment. In this study, we focus on a particularly pernicious type of dirty invention within the chemical technological space: persistent organic pollutants (POPs). These chemicals are internationally recognised as among the most toxic and persistent, with properties that render them resistant to natural degradation. For the first time, we construct a comprehensive dataset of POP patents – those patents that incorporate at least one POP in their formulation – filed between 1990 and 2014. We then georeferenced these patents to analyse their distribution at both global and regional scales. Our analysis delves into the regional factors influencing the prevalence of POP inventions. They reveal a pronounced path dependency effect: regions with a more developed knowledge base in technologies relevant to POPs tend to have a higher volume of POP-related patents. However, this effect is mitigated by the presence of strong social capital within these regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianluca Biggi & Elisa Giuliani & Arianna Martinelli & Angela Parenti, 2025. "Path dependency, social capital and the geography of dirty inventions," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 685-709, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:685-709
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2024.2419591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2024.2419591
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2024.2419591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:685-709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.